Frank B wrote:
I'm working on an application that creates labels. For PNG at 300 dpi, cpu
usage is 2x higher than PDF output. The application can expect high volumes so
performance is important.
Is the relatively poor performance of image output normal? Is there a setting
that can improve the png renderer performance?
One would always expect rendering to have a higher CPU usage than
outputting a vector format.
Otherwise, one would have to assume a zero CPU load when running ghostscript!
BugBear
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
