Hi Jason,
What's the motivation for doing so? I had a quick glance at the slf4j
website and it just looks like yet another logging framework. What
problem does it solve, and what benefits does it have over commons logging?
Thanks,
Chris
On 24/04/2014 01:10, Jason Harrop wrote:
Any chance for FOP 2.0 of replacing commons-logging with slf4j? Would
also need to be done in xmlgraphics commons.
In the meantime, using jcl-over-slf4j instead of commons-logging
works; see http://www.slf4j.org/legacy.html
But it be nice not to need even that.
thanks .. Jason
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Bonekrusher <djs...@yahoo.com
<mailto:djs...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Thanks. These errors are being handled by the Apache Common
Logging. I was
able to turn off Logging:
System.setProperty("org.apache.commons.logging.Log",
"org.apache.commons.logging.impl.NoOpLog");
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/EventListener-SEVERE-events-tp38650p38652.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
<mailto:fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
