All right, I hereby ask creating new repository foreman-bootloaders under theforeman organization. Since 1.14 is almost done, I would like to have first nightly builds available so users can start testing this.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > Any other opinions? Are folks fine with my proposal? I am not going to do > RFE for this one, it's small thing. > > LZ > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Lobato Garcia < >> elobat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks, this is very helpful and should probably be delivered with >>> Foreman itself. As far as I know you'd need to overwrite the bootloaders >>> if you change to Debian-family OSs (rendering provisioning with RH >>> family broken). If that issue could be solved I think it'd make sense to >>> install this package along the TFTP smart proxy >>> >>> How could that work so that we don't have to overwrite the bootloaders >>> every time we want to provision a host of a different OS family? >>> >> >> Can you elaborate on the error you see? I don't understand how PXE loader >> can change behavior of kernel command line, it's being rendered by >> provision templates, therefore for Debian family you simply associate the >> correct template and this should work with Grub2 from Fedora or CentOS. >> >> >> -- >> Later, >> Lukas @lzap Zapletal >> > > > > -- > Later, > Lukas @lzap Zapletal > -- Later, Lukas @lzap Zapletal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
