On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:09:10 -0400 Andrew Kofink <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > If given a choice, I would vote for Nailgun, a more mature project with > more contributors and guaranteed future contribution from Satellite QA. > There is a bit of a gap between foreman-ansible-modules and Nailgun, given > that it is not purpose built; for this, we do include > ansible_nailgun_cement.py [1]. > > I appreciate the support and interest from the community.
So far we've only used python-foreman in a few different projects, one to configure Foreman based on a YAML file. We use python-foreman to resolve the IDs first thus the actual names of the templates, etc. can be used. Working with the lib is nice but it still needs some glue because the API is inconsistent and doing a lookup for the ID is not aligned for all resources. I have no experience with nailgun but from my point of view dependencies are not that big of a deal when provided as proper packages. E.g. to use the Ansible mysql_db module you require python-mysqldb. I'd love to switch to an upstream Ansible module to configure Foreman and improve our existing playbooks. Thanks for all the hard work so far! Kind regards Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
pgpjKv1OglUbv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
