On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:29:37AM +0100, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > We should start tracking test breakages in time, if we have a test > that did not break for a year, lets delete it. As simple as that. It's > added value is almost zero.
All tests are valuable. We do need a high test coverage in order to be able to do things like Rails upgrades. > This is not out of my head, I've heard that on a talk somewhere. > Instead of deleting, we can move it to archive - run them on a nightly > basis, if we find this too much. Frankly, I prefer deletion. We can define these tests as a seperate set that gets only a weekly run, but deletion is IMHO the completetly wrong way. > Also, let's ditch unit tests in favor of integration tests. We have a > lot of areas covered with both and this is extra work and slowing down > things. I think both are needed. Integration tests are much slower than unit tests, in general. -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
