> We can define these tests as a seperate set that gets only a weekly run, > but deletion is IMHO the completetly wrong way.
https://rbcs-us.com/documents/Why-Most-Unit-Testing-is-Waste.pdf A cleanup *is* reasonable, not completely wrong way. I bet that week after we move this into 2nd tier it starts breaking and nobody will care, because code would had been merged already. That's the point here. > I think both are needed. Integration tests are much slower than unit > tests, in general. And by the way our unit tests are not fast, really. They are slow as hell, mainly because most of them are not really unit tests. I am speaking to you, model tests. Let me give you an example: test/models/architecture_test.rb Not a unit test, not an integration test, not a system test, haven't failed for a very long time, useless if we have the most important stuff covered in an integration or system test, which we do. -- Lukas @lzap Zapletal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
