DHCP will not replicate the static leases as I said before, you need twice the omapi using omshell.
I have discussed this with the ISC guys. Op vrijdag 12 augustus 2016 00:26:15 UTC+2 schreef Alvin Starr: > > We have slightly different problems but are both limited by the nature of > foremans dhcp-proxy. > > If you create static leases using omshell then I believe the data will be > replicated to a failover dhcp server. > Forman will create new hosts using omshell. > > The comment about DNS is only because foreman can cleanly interact with > DNS remotely. > > > On 08/11/2016 06:05 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > You are completely wrong. > > What we like to have is a second DHCP with a proxy where is talked to > using OMAPI by foreman so we have a replication about the static leases. > > DHCP itself is unable to sync them this way and for Failover we need to > have 2 writes to 2 DHCP servers which are in clutser mode. > > DNS is not involved here. > > Op donderdag 11 augustus 2016 23:50:43 UTC+2 schreef Alvin Starr: >> >> A standalone DHCP server without lots of extra software installed. >> I do not want to install the whole forman-proxy on the DHCP or DNS ser >> vers >> >> >> As an aside the isc_dhcp proxy does not parse correctly formatted >> dhcpd.conf files(I just filed a bug report). >> >> >> Looking at omapi I could be convinced that it is impossible to get the >> current dhcp config information remotely. >> >> >> On 08/11/2016 05:26 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> What do you mean by a standalone DHCP server ? The proxy handles that >> when you installed the proxy on the DHCP server. >> >> This goes about a second DHCP server that knows the same static leases as >> the proxy knows for failover whent the primary, with proxy, fails. >> >> Op donderdag 11 augustus 2016 22:39:40 UTC+2 schreef Alvin Starr: >>> >>> I have wondered about the same problem. >>> Since foreman needs to read and write the leases and config files it >>> means that you cannot have a remote standalone DHCP server. >>> >>> >>> On 08/11/2016 04:32 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Is this me or does no-one care about DHCP redundancy ? >>> >>> >>> >>> Op zaterdag 16 januari 2016 20:06:30 UTC+1 schreef Matt .: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was wondering if someone has a workaround for DHCP sync with >>>> failover. >>>> >>>> As foreman writes to the leases file directly this is an issue for >>>> syncing. >>>> >>>> Can't we write to a config file we include to the dhcpd.conf and >>>> reload dhcp when the proxy did something to dhcp ? >>>> >>>> Ideas are welcome. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Foreman users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alvin Starr || voice: (905)513-7688 >>> Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)[email protected] >>> || >>> >>> >> -- >> Alvin Starr || voice: (905)513-7688 >> Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)[email protected] >> || >> >> > -- > Alvin Starr || voice: (905)513-7688 > Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)[email protected] > <javascript:> || > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Foreman users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
