Excerpts from Michael K. Johnson's message of 2014-03-21 21:26:26 +0100: > Conary doesn't like it when packages built from the same source have > different contents for the same file. > Also, it doesn't want scripts to mention ld.so.conf without checking > that it won't break ld.so.conf, since ld.so.conf.d is supposed to be > the way to affect the ld path without a chance of breaking things.
are these packaging bugs fixable upstream? greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life hackerspace beijing - http://qike.info -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org BLUG secretary beijinglug.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin Bähr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
