On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 01:34:54AM +0100, Martin Bähr wrote: > Excerpts from Michael K. Johnson's message of 2014-03-21 21:26:26 +0100: > > Conary doesn't like it when packages built from the same source have > > different contents for the same file. > > Also, it doesn't want scripts to mention ld.so.conf without checking > > that it won't break ld.so.conf, since ld.so.conf.d is supposed to be > > the way to affect the ld path without a chance of breaking things. > > are these packaging bugs fixable upstream?
I expect so, yes. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.foresightlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
