On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Stephanie
Watson<s...@foresightlinux.org> wrote:
> I have waited to give my thoughts on this because I wanted to carefully word
> my response to be as useful as possible.
>
> LAYER 1 of 2... the non-technical end-user, and the easy out-of-box
> experience:
>
> One of the original goals of Foresight was to ensure a clean and simple
> desktop with the latest versions of some cool open source software for using
> the Internet, doing office work, listening to music, watching video, and
> just generally ensuring that "your desktop should be cool."  This applies to
> even the most non-technical audience who needs an easy-to-use out-of-box
> experience that is also easy to maintain.  I would prefer that continue to
> be our target audience from the desktop perspective.
>
> Conary is its own animal.  One thing I have been wanting to do, but just not
> had sufficient time to do, is further develop the project I started at
> conaryuncorked.org: provide all levels of instructional material for both
> maintaining a Conary-based system and for packaging software to be installed
> and managed by Conary.
>
> Does fedoraproject.org primarily promote RPM and YUM?  Does ubuntu.com dive
> into the advantages of APT?  Even though Conary is the key reason that
> Foresight is "teh @\/\/350|V|3" for us, trying that to a non-technical
> end-user that they should use Foresight because of Conary.  It is as
> convincing as saying that you should fly Delta airlines because they run on
> pixie dust.  (Just trust us!  The pixie dust is awesome!  You'll love it!)
>
> ACTION SUGGESTION: Make sure the first page a user lands on at
> foresightlinux.org spins Foresight as "easier to maintain, and always has
> the latest versions of your applications thanks to innovative underlying
> technology not available in other desktop OSes."  In this way, you have
> conveyed the features of Conary that make Foresight so great, but you have
> not assumed instant trust in the word "Conary."

Agreed with actions Suggestion. But i think we must focus to layer 2/2

> LAYER 2 of 2... the Linux enthusiast ready to go deeper:
>
> Naturally, as Linux enthusiasts, after the new and shiny has worn off of a
> new distro experience, we are ready to break it apart and bend it to our
> will.  For this, I think all of you are on the right track, though we have
> to be careful to add the knowledge in layers instead of tossing the think
> "Conary" book at them.  Here's where I think my conaryuncorked.org project
> can come into play; if you think this is a useful project, I will dive into
> it more in the coming weeks.
>
> ACTION SUGGESTION: From the front page of foresightlinux.org, let's keep it
> even simpler than before, kind of like Fedora has done at fedoraproject.org.
> Besides the main page, have a "Downloads" page and a "Get Help" page that
> address the same audience as the main page, but then have a single page that
> is the "Linux Geeks Guide to Foresight."  That single geek intro page can
> lead to the wiki and other resources that dive into the technical realm.

im prefer set a diff with other distro website structure. for set the
differences of us.

> I think if we go toward this two-layer kind of system, we can ensure each
> goal addresses one or both of these audiences, and we can balance that over
> time.  If, by some chance, Ubunu decides to abandon its Debian roots and
> embrace Conary... well, Foresight will no longer be competitve for the
> first-layer audience described here.  In the meantime, though, I don't want
> to forget them, especially since Foresight may be their introduction to
> Linux in general.

Ubuntu left deb ? i dont think so All employee are deb experts.


> So there you go... some of my thoughts... responses?
>
> -Stef
>
> --
> Stephanie Watson
> Raleigh, North Carolina
> _______________________________________________
> Foresight-devel mailing list
> Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org
> http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Foresight-devel mailing list
Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org
http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel

Reply via email to