On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Scott Parkerson <scott.parker...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Andres Vargas > <zod...@foresightlinux.org> wrote: > > ooh i can seen the issue: > > > > FL-2053: gnome-packagekit support Gnome proxy settings > > This is not a blocker, but it's not hard. Just need to pass proxy > settings into the Conary Configuration when creting the backend. > agreed > > FL-2014: Packagekit break when conary running > > This has been a long standing issue. Still, probably not a blocker. > agreed > FL-2394: Updating a system using PackageKit is not equivalent to doing > > a conary updateall. > > This is precisely why I'm doing this. This is *absolutely* a blocker > for this release, as you aren't guaranteed a successful update using > the GUI currently (it just generates many updatejobs using packagekit > ids instead of the properly-generated set of updatejobs from using the > "top-level" troves). > > Oh cra!t im confuse the issue FL-2394 im not check it on web yes reason .. yes packagekit have problem on get-updates. > > are trivial and not need attention for release 2.3.0.. i think remove > > it from roadmap and put on next release .. > > > > So smerp have a lot of task,can asign me. > > > FL-2395: PackageKit backend should support simulate-* methods > > doing this task i can said packagekit its ready. > > Initially, I thought that we didn't have to do this; now that I fully > understand the interaction between the GUI and the backend, we should. > I'd back out any patches you have made to remove the simulate methods. > > I'm handling it, as I think we just need to sprint thru the update > jobs and emit the appropriate messages to the PK frontend rather than > doing a full applyUpdateJobs(test=True), which was what I was doing. Zodman: As far as things that I'd like to see get done, if you can > make FL-2014 and FL-2053 work, that would be great. The proxy issue's > probably more important, IMHO. > OK ok .. im getting FL-2014 and FL-2053 BTW, I've been checking in changes into Hughsie's git repo on > packagekit.org, so use that as a starting point. I'm planning on > backporting most of the backend changes into the 0.5.X branch with his > permission once I'm done. > and changes are you commiting you pushing it ? for get the same code of you and no break get-updates... > --sgp > _______________________________________________ > Foresight-devel mailing list > Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org > http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel > _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
