i have not update my machine for long time. let me check ... if every works.
Tnx for the report. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Martin Bähr <mba...@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:59:15PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: >> What packagekit does should continue to work on conary 2.2; the >> old interfaces remain. > > ok. i sort of expected that, but it is my impression that the packagekit > backend duplicates some of the work that conary 2.1 does [1] which > causes packagekit to need for lots of memory for large updates, which > would not go away when using 2.2 > > [1]: by tracking the packages to be updated, and telling conary to > update them one at a time, in order to give the user better feedback in > what is happening, as opposed to the dumbest/simplest possible way of > simply issuing a "conary updateall" command > >> However, we'll *want* to rewrite it because it should make it >> possible to have a much better interface and user experience. >> :-) > > i'd settle for "less memory use" :-) > > greetings, martin. > -- > cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and unix > searching contract jobs: debugging, programming, training and administration > -- > pike programmer working in china community.gotpike.org > foresight developer (open-steam|caudium).org foresightlinux.org > unix sysadmin iaeste.at realss.com > Martin Bähr http://www.iaeste.at/~mbaehr/ is.schon.org > _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
