On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:14:29AM +0200, Martin Bähr wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:59:15PM -0400, Michael K. Johnson wrote: > > What packagekit does should continue to work on conary 2.2; the > > old interfaces remain. > > ok. i sort of expected that, but it is my impression that the packagekit > backend duplicates some of the work that conary 2.1 does [1] which > causes packagekit to need for lots of memory for large updates, which > would not go away when using 2.2 > > [1]: by tracking the packages to be updated, and telling conary to > update them one at a time, in order to give the user better feedback in > what is happening, as opposed to the dumbest/simplest possible way of > simply issuing a "conary updateall" command
Oh, it still does that? That is a serious bug, then, and I wouldn't expect updates to function that way reliably; it might work sometimes, but will break in ways that are not easily predictable and will be hard to diagnose. _______________________________________________ Foresight-devel mailing list Foresight-devel@lists.rpath.org http://lists.rpath.org/mailman/listinfo/foresight-devel
