Yes, obviously they do. My misstake was to rely on the -U flag (and not removing the org.eclipse folder in the repo). Now it works, thx...
.../Andreas Patrik Nordwall wrote: > > The order actually matters. > > I removed my local repo and was able to reproduce the error. > Thereafter I removed it again and changed the order, fornax repo first. > Then I have build successful. > > Probably you didn't remove the repository, and I don't blame you, since > the fornax repo is so slooow (first time build takes 20 min, second time > 12 seconds). However, I guess it is not much we can do about the > performance of fornax repo. I will adjust the installation guide. > > /Patrik > > > bear50 wrote: >> >> FYI, I tried to put the fornax repo in front of the ibiblio, but with the >> same result... >> >> .../Andreas >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-fornax-repository--missing-equinox-dependency-tp14252094s17564p14260032.html Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Fornax-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fornax-developer
