There is an ASF wide OID assigned, so I think you can just ask Alex for a sub-id for Fortress.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxPMGT/OID+Assignment+Scheme Kind Regards, Stefan On 09/22/2016 08:25 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > I’m in favor of registering anew because if / when fortress becomes an apache > TLP we won’t have do this again. And, because there aren’t any advantages to > sharing an IANA with the parent project, that I can think of. > > We can assume it will take a few weeks before a new IANA # can be obtained. > > WDYT? > > Shawn > >> On Sep 22, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Chris Pike <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are there plans to do this? I don't want to go to the trouble of changing >> it, then having to change it again. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Shawn McKinney" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:06:11 PM >> Subject: Re: Schema Base OID >> >> Correct. There’s another issue here. That fortress IANA # is a relic: >> 38088 >> Joshua Tree Software, LLC >> Shawn McKinney >> shawn.mckinney&jtstools.com >> >> and should use apache directory's, or perhaps register for another specific >> to apache fortress. >> >> Shawn >> >>> On Sep 22, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Chris Pike <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> nm, I think we figured out that the OID is wrong in the old files >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Chris Pike" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:19:56 PM >>> Subject: Schema Base OID >>> >>> Shawn, >>> >>> Looking at the change in the schema file to use a base objectidentifier >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/directory-fortress-core/commit/b87766080fa096e66b6289accad62ba0de7dbba2#diff-e95924a7d2c92a1675f9a245a80c3b8e >>> >>> the base identifier is set to "1.3.6.1.4.1.38088", but shouldn't it be >>> "1.3.6.1.4.1.1.38088" (an extra 1 between 1 and 38088)? >
