I think a vim implementation of this feature is very useful. One defines a
foldable block by a set of open and close characters. In my case, {{{ opens
and }}} closes. This makes it easy, simply put the brackets in a comment for
your language and poof, a fold anywhere you want it.
I don't know how difficult this type of folding would be to implement, but I
sure love it. My code looks like a story when it is all folded up (even in
perl!)
-Dwayne
>>> Holger Biehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/21/2007 2:11 PM >>>
whacker:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hate to say this but when can we have the code block expand and collapse? I
think this is a feature long overdue and should be given a very high priority
over other features.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't need codefolding when the Code-Explorer works correct. A function to
find next upper/lower bound of current codeblock would be enough for me and
could be made language indepentant.
PSPad knows already a lot of Languages, which one is "high priority"???
I think here is the bug forum and here comes some
(repeat list):
The new Version highlights labels for Progress.
Thanks Jan...;-)
But it only highlight them if they are in the first or second Column.
Further a "do:" and a "repeat:" is also highlighted as Label.
Code-Explorer still cuts Procedure and Function Names at a "-".
Highlightning of multiline Strings is not correct:
(example)
d = "ab
c"
(Progress is able to include Files and give them Preprocessing-Parameters in
Form:
{y/incl/y__prt00.if
&Firm = "Firm"
&ReferenzNr = "ReferenzNr"
&BufKopf = "Buffertable"
&Optional = "find Buffer2
/* even within a Comment: complete Text is referred to the Include as it is
between Brackets */
of Buffertable"
}
where "&Optional" could be a unspecified optional search in the Include to
manipulate the result.
Surely, if that findstatement would be longer this is unreadable within one line
strings.
Preprocessorstatements are still not highlighted
begins with { ends with } (Multiline).
And as surely remarked once:
For Progress including Includes and commenting Comments is possible and not
correct highlighted.
I don't know that much other Languages, but I need PSPad for Progress. Maybe
it's easier to make a new Codeparser/Highlighter for it???
These are things of "high priority" for me and some of these things are surely
the same in other languages.
Jan, please first finish your next stable release.
Please have a look what you can do for me after that.
I know that highlightning is not easy to handle with that much languages...
--
<http://forum.pspad.com/read.php?6,41374,41462>
PSPad freeware editor http://www.pspad.com
Příspěvek zaslán emailem. <http://forum.pspad.com/read.php?6,41374,41462>
PSPad freeware editor http://www.pspad.com
