pspad: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Let the @ char in keywords char, cause it's really part of keywords. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Question: Is the field KeyWordChars still needed in general in PSPad or can it be dropped completely from the application, with the "allowed chars in keywords" being derived from the keywords actual in the syntax file instead? (Note: Texinfo currently needs the @, otherwise keywords within the text aren't highlighted). pspad: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Code explorer isn't user definable. I need to know what should be code explorer content and I will add it -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hierarchical nodes in Texinfo (that I'm aware of): [@part ->] [@chapter ->] [@section | @unnumberedsec ->] [@subsection] [@part ->] [@appendix ->] [@section | @unnumberedsec | @appendixsec | @appendixsection ->] [@subsection] No need to distinguish between both variants via single "main" nodes. And ideally another node for the includes: @include See https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/texinfo.html#toc-Chapter-Str ucturing-1 for the details -- <http://forum.pspad.com/read.php?6,68690,68752> PSPad freeware editor http://www.pspad.com
