This message is from the T13 list server.
Yes, I forgot about the strange extra ECC byte issue. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Hale Landis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:31 AM To: T13 List Server Subject: RE: [t13] vendor-specific as good as optional, outside the o.s.? This message is from the T13 list server. On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:08:12 -0700, Pat LaVarre wrote: >This message is from the T13 list server. >Here we see industry again flatly disregarding the published standard? No, there never was a published "standard" for the R/W LONG command protocol. Not in CAM ATA, not in ATA-x. The big problem was always the effect of SET FEATURES on R/W LONG and how those extra ECC bytes were transferred. None of this was clearly stated and many possible implementations could claim "compliance". *** Hale Landis *** www.ata-atapi.com ***
