This message is from the T13 list server.


Unless of course, the thing on the other end is broke.

That's why it should abort the command, then never clear busy following any reset.

He's dead Jim!



At 3:05 PM -0800 3/8/05, Mark Overby wrote:
This message is from the T13 list server.


The problem with that is how do you differentiate between an interface problem and a problem with a cached write? Sounds like what you're really asking for is DF behavior or a new error bit behavior.

As a host I can't tell the difference. If the BSY bit is stuck on, I'm
going to expect to be able to clear that with either a SRST, hard reset,
or COMRESET (depending on the interface)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Larry Barras
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 2:18 PM
To: Harlan Andrews; John Masiewicz
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [t13] Inquiries into SATA material during ATA/8 review

This message is from the T13 list server.


There is a subtle difference between "freeze" and abort in this case.

What the drive should actually do in this case is abort the command
and stick busy.

Freeze would mean literally "do nothing".

I brought up the same point at the discussion, but I see what they
are getting at with the term freeze meaning "do nothing". What we
want in this case is the drive to abort and stay BSY=1 until power
cycled as a signal that things have gone very wrong.



At 2:06 PM -0800 3/8/05, Harlan Andrews wrote:
John,

One case where drives currently "Freeze" is when a cashed write
fails.    At that point, the host must be notified that one or more
of the previously successfully acknowledged writes was unable to be
written.    The current behavior of several drives is to freeze
until a power cycle occurs.   NOTE:   a COMRESET does NOT ( and
should not) reset this condition.  Only the power cycle resets this
condition.

I would MUCH rather see a more identifiable error condition.
Ideally, the drive should return a specific error to ALL commands
until it is explicitly reset by the host.    The "reset" should NOT
be any currently defined command.   It should be explicitly reserved
to reset the failed cashed write.   The host must not be allowed to
continue without specifically acknowledging that data on the drive
HAS BEEN CORRUPTED.

...Harlan


On Mar 8, 2005, at 1:44 PM, John Masiewicz wrote:

Brian,

I don't think you asked quite the right questions as posed in the
meeting, especially regarding the BIST.

BIST was not listed are re-transmittable in the list, but if you
look at the Device Transport BIST Activate state diagram, a retry
is explicitly directed. This was the inconsistency we were trying
correct. I don't have any problem adding a note, but the two
section are not in agreement, thus the request for clarification,
it there is any.



The issue with "Freeze" is that it is recommended. I cannot think
of any condition where I would recommend a drive "Freeze" as a
policy. (I have no objection to hosts freezing) Freeze means rely
on timeouts, which in ATA are as long as 30 seconds. This does not
sound like a good recommendation for error handling if you know you
are in an unrecoverable situation.  Freeze, as discussed in the
meeting, implies do nothing, and respond to nothing (except
COMRESET).  If a device is so perturbed that it unrecoverable and
it knows this, certainly a COMINIT  from the device or COMRESET
from the host might be recommended, but not "freezing".



I prefer eliminating the unnecessary recommendation, since it
offers nothing in terms of error recovery, but rather says do not
perform error recovery. Similarly, it is in a section entitled
"Software error recovery" and I would not recommend that the
software "freeze".



Please, however, review the state machines on the BIST retry, and
>>reconsider your recommendation.



John Masiewicz

Western Digital




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dees, Brian M Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [t13] Inquiries into SATA material during ATA/8 review



Hi,
          During the review of the ATA/8 Serial Transport material
in the February T13 Summit a few items were given to me as the
liaison into the SATA-IO to research the meaning or intent.  Below
are the questions and responses I've recorded in finding the
details.

1. What was the original intent of listing 'Freeze' as a valid
category for error responses? (see sections 10.1 & 10.5.2 of
d1697r0a-ATA8-ST, where Freeze has been removed)

<Original reference in sections 11.1 (pg 273) and 11.5.2 (pg 279)
of Serial ATA 1.0a.>
Freeze is the condition the drive enters where a host action like a
reset is required to recover the drive. Whether you admit it or
not, it is not unusual for drives to enter this state. Serial ATA
might have been the first to explicitly call this behavior out,
although it is not an unusual occurrence. In hopelessly messed up
situations, it is probably safer for a drive to halt and await the
host cleaning up with a reset than it might be for the drive to
proceed and potentially exacerbate the situation.

2. Why isn't BIST Activate included in the list of frame types that
can be retransmitted? (see section 10.4.3.2 of d1697r0a-ATA8-ST)

<Original reference in section 11.4.2.2 (page 278) of Serial ATA
1.0a.>
BIST is not a function performed during the normal course of
operation for a disk drive. Since it's an engineering lab-bench
function to be used in controlled conditions by knowledgeable
experts, it does not have the kinds of automatic recovery that
normal user functions might have. In some lab settings, it could
even be detrimental for auto-recovery operations to be performed by
the interface, since some lab functions are for the purpose of
examining such behaviors. If the BIST Activate function fails in a
lab setting, the engineer is presumably sufficiently capable to
know what is happening and attempt the operation over again.

         With the understanding of the above explanations, I believe
that 'Freeze' should be re-inserted back into the ATA/8 material
and that BIST Activate should still not exist in the list referred
to by question #2.  This would require three total edits, although
minor, into the next revision of the document.

Regards,
Brian


--

---------------------
I make stuff go.
---------------------

Larry Barras
Apple Computer Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
MS:  306-2TC
Cupertino, CA  95014
(408) 974-3220


--

---------------------
I make stuff go.
---------------------

Larry Barras
Apple Computer Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
MS:  306-2TC
Cupertino, CA  95014
(408) 974-3220

Reply via email to