This message is from the T13 list server.

Please see my comments delimited by              "jhat>>"

Thank You !!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Hatfield
Seagate Technology LLC
   e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   s-mail:  389 Disc Drive;  Longmont, CO 80503 USA
   voice:  720-684-2120
   fax....:  720-684-2711
==========================================


                                                                           
             "Elliott, Robert                                              
             (Server Storage)"                                             
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                           To 
             Sent by:                  <[email protected]>                     
             [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          cc 
             rg                                                            
             No Phone Info                                         Subject 
             Available                 [t13] RE: Security Mode feature set 
                                       changes                             
                                                                           
             11/29/2005 09:55                                              
             AM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




This message is from the T13 list server.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 9:30 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [t13] New docs posted
> ...
> (new) ATA Security Mode feature set changes
> http://t13.org/docs2005/e05179r0-ACS-SecurityChanges.pdf

One technical question I had on this feature set that is not addressed
by your proposal:

Why don't SECURITY ERASE UNIT and SECURITY DISABLE PASSWORD also
decrement the attempt counter like SECURITY UNLOCK if the password is
bad?  They all effectively perform an unlock (SECURITY ERASE UNIT does a
lot more).
      jhat> This was never part of the ATA security feature set,
      jhat> which dates back to ATA-3 (1996), and nobody complained before.


A few editorial nits:
In proposed 1.1.1, "Security Retries Expired" is introduced, but never
used anywhere.
      jhat> In ATA8, this is referred to by the term 'attempt limit'.
      jhat> It would be appropriate to use a consistent term everywhere.

In proposed table 1, the fact that the attempt limit counter is
decremented should be noted in the appropriate cells.
      jhat> The purpose of Table 1 is primarily to show the relation
      jhat> between the 'security level', which password is used,
      jhat> and some commands that care. There are other considerations
      jhat> and restrictions for all of these commands. Table 1 is not
      jhat> intended to be all-encompassing - - it provides a cross-section
      jhat> of a complex set of requirements.


Section 1.10.2 introduces a "the the"
      jhat> Thank you for reporting this.

--
Rob Elliott, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hewlett-Packard Industry Standard Server Storage Advanced Technology
https://ecardfile.com/id/RobElliott





Reply via email to