Proposal e06125r0 includes that change to IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE; it doesn't try to change IDENTIFY DEVICE (which would also make sense to me).
According to the April 2006 minutes, T13 accepted the proposal for ATA8-ACS2 rather than ATA8-ACS. I don't know why they don't want to incorporate it sooner.
--
Rob Elliott, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hewlett-Packard Industry Standard Server Storage Advanced Technology
https://ecardfile.com/id/RobElliott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of kepler
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 3:45 AM
> To: t13-ATA
> Cc: ATA VIP Support center
> Subject: [t13] Shall bit 9 of words 82 and 85 be fixed to 0
> in the IDENTIFY DEVICE information and be fixed to 1 in the
> IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE information
>
> This message is from the T13 list server.
>
>
> According to clause 8.9.2 on page 100, the DEVICE RESET command is use
> prohibited when the PACKET Command feature set is not implemented, but
> this command is mandatory when the PACKET Command feature set is
> implemented.
>
> Shall bit 9 of words 82 and 85 be fixed to 0 in the IDENTIFY DEVICE
> information to indicate the use prohibition of the DEVICE
> RESET command
> for devices not implementing the PACKET Command feature set?
>
> Shall bit 9 of words 82 and 85 be fixed to 1 in the IDENTIFY PACKET
> DEVICE inofrmation to indicate that the DEVICE RESET command is
> mandatory for devices implementing the PACKET Command feature set?
>
> Kepler
>
>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
