This message is from the T13 list server.
Listing the 'accepted' status of proposals is a new feature of the t13
website
and has only been done for the '2006 documents' category.
These are documents that have been discussed at plenary meetings in 2006.
For the status of other documents, read the official minutes of meetings
where they
have been discussed.
Thank You !!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jim Hatfield
Seagate Technology LLC
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s-mail: 389 Disc Drive; Longmont, CO 80503 USA
voice: 720-684-2120
fax....: 720-684-2711
==========================================
Luis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.com.tw> To
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED], forum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <forum@t13.org>
rg cc
No Phone Info kepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Available Subject
Re: [t13] ATA Security
08/21/2006 04:51
AM
This message is from the T13 list server.
Hello Mr. Hatfield:
Thank you very much for the clarification. I had read this clarification
from the 2006 documents, but was not sure if this chabge had been
accepted or not.
Q: In regards to documents from previous years, for example 2005, are
these documents those that were accepted that year alone. Or are
proposals that have not yet been accepted maintained as well?
Thanks again for your help.
Regards,
Luis E. Rodriguez
____________________
Software Engineer
Avery Design Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>This message is from the T13 list server.
>
>
><hatfield> Please see my responses below.
>
>Thank You !!!
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Jim Hatfield
>Seagate Technology LLC
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> s-mail: 389 Disc Drive; Longmont, CO 80503 USA
> voice: 720-684-2120
> fax....: 720-684-2711
>==========================================
>
>
>
> Luis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> n.com.tw> To
> Sent by: forum@t13.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
> rg
> No Phone Info Subject
> Available [t13] ATA Security
>
>
> 08/20/2006 08:33
> PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>This message is from the T13 list server.
>
>
>Hello everyone,
>
>I have recently joined the e-mail reflector for T13,
>
>Many questions have popped in my mind about the SECURITY commands:
>
>When using the Master Password, and the security level is Maximum, what
>is the expected response of the device when receiving the following
>commands
>(abort/execute):
>
>SECURITY DISABLE PASSWORD
><hatfield> abort the command
>
>SECURITY ERASE UNIT
><hatfield> execute the command
>
>SECURITY UNLOCK
><hatfield> abort the command
>
>
>I have read the proposals under the Documents 2006 by *Hatfield/Wolford*
>regarding ATA Security issues. In the case that a proposal does not have
>"Accepted"
>should it be regarded as just a suggestion and not yet as a correction or
>update to the previous
>Spec. And in the case that it is "Accepted", should I interpret the
>document as an accepted revision to
>the Spec?
><hatfield> 'accepted' means that it has been accepted for incorporation
>into the standard.
><hatfield> BUT - nothing is final until the entire standard has been voted
>on, letter ballots accepted, forwarded to INCITS, and
><hatfield> INCITS has accepted it. Until all that is done, some things can
>still change.
>
>
>
>
>Thank's in advanace to anyone who may provide some answers regarding
>these matters. Any clarifications on the issue of ATA Security would be
>very useful to me.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>Luis E. Rodriguez
>
>Software Engineer
>Avery-Design Systems
>
>
>
>
>
>
