This message is from the T13 list server.
All proposals are listed on the site. Rejected, accepted, or in progress. It is a new tracking feature for proposals that have been incorporated. I would suggest looking at the revision histories for a given standard for older proposals to see if it has been integrated. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 3:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; forum Cc: kepler Subject: Re: [t13] ATA Security This message is from the T13 list server. Hello Mr. Hatfield: Thank you very much for the clarification. I had read this clarification from the 2006 documents, but was not sure if this chabge had been accepted or not. Q: In regards to documents from previous years, for example 2005, are these documents those that were accepted that year alone. Or are proposals that have not yet been accepted maintained as well? Thanks again for your help. Regards, Luis E. Rodriguez ____________________ Software Engineer Avery Design Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This message is from the T13 list server. > > ><hatfield> Please see my responses below. > >Thank You !!! >----------------------------------------------------------------- >Jim Hatfield >Seagate Technology LLC > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > s-mail: 389 Disc Drive; Longmont, CO 80503 USA > voice: 720-684-2120 > fax....: 720-684-2711 >========================================== > > > > Luis > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > n.com.tw> To > Sent by: forum@t13.org > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc > rg > No Phone Info Subject > Available [t13] ATA Security > > > 08/20/2006 08:33 > PM > > > > > > >This message is from the T13 list server. > > >Hello everyone, > >I have recently joined the e-mail reflector for T13, > >Many questions have popped in my mind about the SECURITY commands: > >When using the Master Password, and the security level is Maximum, what >is the expected response of the device when receiving the following >commands >(abort/execute): > >SECURITY DISABLE PASSWORD ><hatfield> abort the command > >SECURITY ERASE UNIT ><hatfield> execute the command > >SECURITY UNLOCK ><hatfield> abort the command > > >I have read the proposals under the Documents 2006 by *Hatfield/Wolford* >regarding ATA Security issues. In the case that a proposal does not have >"Accepted" >should it be regarded as just a suggestion and not yet as a correction or >update to the previous >Spec. And in the case that it is "Accepted", should I interpret the >document as an accepted revision to >the Spec? ><hatfield> 'accepted' means that it has been accepted for incorporation >into the standard. ><hatfield> BUT - nothing is final until the entire standard has been voted >on, letter ballots accepted, forwarded to INCITS, and ><hatfield> INCITS has accepted it. Until all that is done, some things can >still change. > > > > >Thank's in advanace to anyone who may provide some answers regarding >these matters. Any clarifications on the issue of ATA Security would be >very useful to me. > >Regards, > > >Luis E. Rodriguez > >Software Engineer >Avery-Design Systems > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
