--- Em seg, 2/1/12, Mauro Ugarte Avilés <[email protected]> escreveu:
> De: Mauro Ugarte Avilés <[email protected]> > Assunto: Re: [FOSS-GPS] Re: New Project with RTKlib & need help. > Para: "Open Source GPS-related discussion and support" > <[email protected]> > Data: Segunda-feira, 2 de Janeiro de 2012, 17:55 > > > > > Taking your words, I'm not good at GPS relative terms > and algorithms too. > > > Me neither :-) > > I think that the moving base must have an fixed and > known lenght . > If you review the "setting2" tab on RTKNAVI 2.4.x options, > you will see > that the "Baseline Length Constraint (m)" is an option, not > a > requirement, even when "Moving Base" is selected as > positioning mode on > "setting1" tab. Considering this, I thought that both > options where > valid (constrained and unconstrained length). One may think > that is just > a programming bug if it remains as an option and not as a > requirement, > but if you select "moving base" you will see that on the > "Positions" tab > automatically the option to input the base antenna position > dissapeared, > from which I conclude that nothing is left to chance on > this swiss knife > that RTKlib is :-). Hi Mauro, tks for your explanation, I hope to return to study the RTKLIB very soon. As you say, "nothing is left to chance on this swiss knife" ! A moving base without lenght constrains let me realy impressed with RTKLIB. My tks for all developers. []s julio menezes _______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
