Thanks for your reply. "However, one receiver or other (the least mobile one) needs positioning some other way to give the whole system good absolute positioning. " 1] It means, at least, one receiver needs high accuracy position information? We assume that whole system equips with the same level accuracy receiver(2m error & 300m baseline)
"I've got very good results (sub decimetre over short baselines) from moving baseline positioning in terms of the vector between two moving receivers." 2] what is the meaning of "in terms of the vector" ? 3] We don't need absolute positioning. How about the relative positioning(= Just Distance and direction)? Does movingbase can meet the requirements(increased distance accuracy and direction) by movingbase function? thanks again -- View this message in context: http://open-source-gps-related-discussion-and-support.1099874.n2.nabble.com/Does-Moving-Base-RTK-increase-both-receiver-s-accuracy-or-increase-one-to-other-s-accuracy-tp7279597p7283048.html Sent from the Open Source GPS-related discussion and support mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list. Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your subscription For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
