Did you try with simultaneous mode of ambiguity resolution and use a smaller 
min ratio to fix ambiguity, such as 2 or 1.5?

Kind regards,
Yanqing

> On 17 Sep 2014, at 23:05, "Sean Hyde" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hey Guys,
>  
> I’ve been playing around with RTKLib for a couple months now and have run 
> into some issues and I was wondering if anyone had any idea on how to improve 
> performance.
>  
> ---Setup---
> Base Station:
> NVS08C on custom PCB using the receiver to power the antenna
> Antenna is Taoglas Limited AA.161.301111 
> (http://www.taoglas.com/images/product_images/original_images/AA.161.301111.pdf)
> Antenna is on a 12” x 24” steel plate
> Connected via FTDI->USB to Rasperry Pi
> Raspberry Pi runs str2str to send the data to Windows laptop running rtknavi 
> using wifi backhaul
>  
> Rover:
> NVS08C on custom PCB using the receiver to power the antenna
> Antenna is Taoglas Limited AA.161.301111 
> (http://www.taoglas.com/images/product_images/original_images/AA.161.301111.pdf)
> Antenna is on a 18” x 18” steel plate
> Connected via FTDI->USB to Rasperry Pi
> Raspberry Pi runs str2str to send the data to Windows laptop running rtknavi 
> using wifi backhaul
>  
> The Rover setup is on a small mobile robot with a top speed of about 3mph.  
> It is in a city (Pittsburgh), but the sky is relatively unobstructed.
>  
> I’m running rtknavi in Kinematic mode using only GPS, L1+L2, 15deg elevation 
> mask.  The position that I input for the base station is a 5 hour average 
> (though it seems to have lost some precision when I pasted it?).  I have 
> tried both Continuous and Fix and Hold Integer Ambiguity Res.  I’ll try to 
> attach screen shots of rtknavi.
>  
> Right now, it kind of works.  I can get relatively jitter-free floats and 
> occasionally fixes, but these fixes don’t last long and I’m not sure they are 
> actually globally accurate (ie: if you restart the software, you may get a 
> fix, but it may be several meters from your last fix).  Sometimes a fix goes 
> away and never seems to come back.
>  
> I’m wondering if you guys have any suggestions to improve these results.
> Better antennas? (Which ones?)
> Trying to get better placement of the base station?
> Different settings in rtknavi?
> Continuous vs Fix and Hold?
>  
> Thanks!
> -Sean
>  
> <image001.png> <image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png>
> _______________________________________________
> This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list.
> Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
> subscription
> For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS
_______________________________________________
This message is sent to you from [email protected] mailing list.
Visit http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss-gps to manage your 
subscription
For more information, check http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS-GPS

Reply via email to