Did the discussion end there? IMO, we need to have more discussions on
Nepalese keyboard layout.
Please have a look at some of these pages (and more), and keep the
discussion going.

How Tamil Keyboard layout is being designed
http://www.tamilnation.org/digital/tamilnet97/jstandardisation2.htm

Ergonomic layout of a standard keyboard "NEO"
Optimized for the German linguistic area (and western/european area/
unicode)
usable for english and with minor adjustmens of special characters for
other languages
http://pebbles.schattenlauf.de/layout/index_us.html

How the Arensito Keyboard Layout was developed:
http://www.pvv.org/~hakonhal/main.cgi/keyboard/arensito_devel

Evaluating Keyboard Layouts
http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/carpalx/?keyboard_evaluation



On Jun 21, 8:14 pm, "Ankur Sharma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys have you heard of devnagari keyboard from dhak prasad upreti, if not
> have a look athttp://dpu.com.np/
> this seems more scientific then any other existing layout.
>
> On 6/21/07, Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm familiar with 3 keyboard layouts for Nepali language:
> > * Devanagari INSCRIPT
> > * Nepali Unicode Romanized
> > *Nepali Unicode Traditional
>
> > I think Devanagari INSCRIPT layout is more scientific thank any other.
> > It comes with Windows 2K and later bundled with the OS. But the
> > learning curve for INSCRIPT is steep and it is designed not only for
> > Nepali language but for all languages which use Devanagari script.
> > I've been using this layout for last 4 years and is quite satisfied.
>
> > Nepali Unicode Romanized is designed by MPP. It is easier to adopt
> > this one because it is designed around english QWERTY layout and
> > Romanization of Nepali. One who is familiar with QWERTY can learn this
> > layout in a day or two.
>
> > Another layout from MPP, Nepali Unicode Traditional is designed for
> > folks who are familiar with बकमान layout. Personally, I really hate
> > this layout because it was designed for old typewriters for Hindi or
> > some other languages.
>
> > So, If you are talking about scientific designs like DVORAK for
> > Nepali, as far as I know, there is none. Since we already have 3
> > layouts is there any need for a fourth one?
>
> > Kumar
>
> > On Jun 20, 11:30 am, "Prasanna Gautam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > we all know there are 2 major types of keyboard layouts in english and
> > most
> > > latin based languages: qwerty and dvorak. Its generally accepted that
> > dvorak
> > > is the more scientific one.. and IMO it is. Is there any equivalent
> > keyboard
> > > layout in Nepali that is more ergonomic?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
FOSS Nepal mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal

Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to