It's easier to read this way, I suggest to leave it as is. I do wonder though if it could display time in local time-zone instead of UTC.
Cheers. - Vikrant On 25 February 2015 at 20:38, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <vi...@viric.name> wrote: > I always understood this was on purpose. :) > > I like how it is. > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:04:54AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: >> The dates on timelines (the YYYY-MM-DD) could be seen as being in the >> wrong place. The dates are positioned at a point on the timeline >> where the HH:MM:SS for the date is 23:59:59.999. But since the >> HH:MM:SS is not shown, that implies it is 00:00:00. >> >> So, in other words, the date stamps are off by one day. >> >> I don't know why I've never noticed this before in almost 8 years of >> using Fossil. >> >> Should I fix this, or leave the display as it is? >> >> -- >> D. Richard Hipp >> d...@sqlite.org >> _______________________________________________ >> fossil-dev mailing list >> fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org >> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev > > -- > Escriu-me sempre xifrat / Write always ciphered > PGP key D4831A8A - https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/ > _______________________________________________ > fossil-dev mailing list > fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev _______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
