-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/25/2015 10:49 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:04:54 -0500: > >> The dates on timelines (the YYYY-MM-DD) could be seen as being >> in the wrong place. The dates are positioned at a point on the >> timeline where the HH:MM:SS for the date is 23:59:59.999. But >> since the HH:MM:SS is not shown, that implies it is 00:00:00. > > Are you suggesting instead that this should be: > > 04:42 04:40 04:37 2015-02-26
Yes, I believe this is what Richard is suggesting. He is right that the above is technically more correct, but such concerns are secondary to usability. ;^) The reason things are as they are is that we're usually reading top to bottom, so the date acts as a prefix for all the items *below* it. - -- Andy Goth | <andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU7zrGAAoJELtYwrrr47Y4MTYIAJ10ggJjbs722swH/eEEK+pY pZxVV/8IslwWT/o0nyp6Ip2ula3G0r4CprfWOlFe8Xj03TFwbKkyPScKFZWVQ/Vw CshZDoHj1w1nGJfG0rDkn9xCLElEwr2vVvU3wOPl7m084xYoxma4SIcPgU7rEOT6 hdr1uOapzs2Rg32kCVBaSDBPqH2r+hqnD6pN++eHxgF4u+5qNw7WQoS6c4BWcxDy cMjvQ9CoFuQ0zI+5JSF/d8dYKfQanCI/ava1HzxBjZ+HioefF+KtYrs5+NUHTUsx 6VuhXOQ1hCGgjoRwxPkdO9DzSjoaJ1vwIn2b7fs2aA+szwQz2WqgWZ3MHRqR8NE= =Jdqq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
