On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> (@Stephan: for some reason your reply ended up in the dev-digest mail,
> but I didn't get a separate mail - didn't end up in spam-filter
> either)
>

Weird - can't explain that :/.


> W.r.t. italic instead of bold: I tried, but found it to be too little
> emphasis...
>

Fair enough.

[66920879] outputs a list of canonical docs after the permuted index,
> perhaps that is nicer. If not, I can try with something like appending
> a '(*)' behind canonical titles, with a footnote explaining what it
> is.
>
>
Looking at this one, i'm curious if it might be more useful (less confusing
for people) if we move your canonical list to the front, and put the
permutated list under it.


The reason I go on about this is that the permuted index strikes me as
> one of the weirder things on the fossil-scm.org site.
>

i agree, but i suspect that's because i personally have no other experience
with such indexes. A relatively recent (==sometime this year) post on the
topic provided a link to Wikipedia which explained the historical uses of
such indexes.

Also, I should probably move this conversation to the fossil-users
> list again, since now it's about preferences :-)
>

Feel free to - my TO field already has the -dev list address in it ;).

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
"Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Reply via email to