On 03/05/2016 09:16, Ross Berteig wrote:
I've built it in all the configurations I build and test on Windows. To do that I had to remove a C99-ism. As far as I know, fossil and SQLite deliberately still build with C89. Since things have happened on trunk, I've merged trunk into the branch, and configured, built and tested the result on Windows. It passes all tests that trunk passes.
Thanks for that - though I'll need to investigate the wiki-15 and wiki-15.1 tests since I'd thought that I had addressed that problem and had all the tests passing.
(Just seen your most recent update and I will be investigating too when I get the chance).
I have no way to evaluate any interaction with the new encrypted repository support since I don't own a license to SEE. I'd imagine that there should be no issue since the only command that seems to have needed any special handling so far is "fossil all", but perhaps someone with SEE available could confirm that the new "fossil wiki" features still work as expected.
I was unaware of any new encryption support and like you have no license to SEE, so we'll definitely need someone with more expertise to take a look
Before I recommend a merge to trunk, I want to review the documentation and tests to make sure that features like the friendly names for mime types are both documented and tested.
Hmm, I thought I had added some (both tests and documentation), but can't find any evidence for that, which suggests some wishful thinking on my part :) - I'll look at that too.
I do think we are getting close.
Agreed! Dave _______________________________________________ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
