On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 15:37:05 -0400
Steven Gawroriski <ste...@multiphasicapps.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:49:43 -0400
> Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 9/19/16, Steven Gawroriski <ste...@multiphasicapps.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > I get the following assertion error:
> > >
> > > fossil: ./src/xfer.c:1893: client_sync: Assertion `uvStatus==2'
> > > failed. Aborted
> > >
> > 
> > The uvStatus various was once used for something, though I don't
> > remember what.  It is unused now.  So I simply removed it.
> > 
> > Let me know if you find anything else wrong.
> > 
> 
> Hello, with the reversion I found an issue.
> 
> If I locally modify an unversioned file and then call the revert
> command, the files which have changed are deleted from my local
> repository.
> 
> However, if I run the revert command again, the files which were
> previously deleted are added back again. So revert needs to be run
> twice.
> 
> I tested adding a file to a local repository and then reverting it
> against another, which operates as it should (the file is removed). 
> 
> Note that touching an unversioned file does not cause it to be
> removed, just changing its contents, when the first revert is called.
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-dev mailing list
> fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Hello,

I have checked out the latest revision and all seems to be well.

I noticed that the unversioned files do not take any shunned
SHA-1s into effect, although personally I would find this to be a good
thing.

If a file is in the unversioned space _and_ the in the actual
repository, is the data deduplicated between them?
_______________________________________________
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Reply via email to