PGP key management is problematic in an enterprise environment. Authenticating against an LDAP/Active Directory server is a whole lot easier.
Gé D. Richard Hipp wrote: > On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Gé Weijers wrote: > >> Another issue is regulatory: sometimes you need to know who committed >> what and when, for auditing purposes. >> > > > This is why I gave fossil the ability to PGP sign check-ins. If a > check-in is PGP-signed, you have high confidence of who created it. > There are also features to track when various artifacts were pushed to > a server, to help track abuse. Of course, somebody can still create > an unsigned check-in with a forged user-id. But in a regulatory > environment, you simply ignore unsigned check-ins. > > Doesn't git also have the ability to PGP-sign check-ins? I seem to > remember reading that, though I have never actually tried to do it. > > > D. Richard Hipp > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

