I just tried that myself on both Linux and Windows and saved almost a MB each. Maybe the makefile should have a strip step in it?
2009/9/24 Altu Faltu <altufa...@mail.com> > I use Windows and after making fossil.exe, I do 'strip fossil.exe' to > reduce size. > > - Altu > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andrey Cherezov" <and...@cherezov.koenig.su> > > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] compact fossil binaries > > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:40:41 +0300 > > > > > > 23.09.2009 15:18, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Sep 23, 2009, at 3:52 AM, Robert wrote: > > > > > >> I was wondering, how do you get such compact fossil binaries? > > >> The best I can do is 1.1Mb compared to your 330kb for linux. > > >> > > > The build is done using exactly the Makefile included in the source > > > tree, with no edits or changes of any kind, on SuSE 10.1 with GCC > 4.1.0. > > > > > Under Mingw (Windows) I removed "-g" option of gcc from Makefile > > and this reduced fossil.exe size from 3Mb to 800kb. > > _______________________________________________ > > fossil-users mailing list > > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > > > > > -- > An Excellent Credit Score is 750 > See Yours in Just 2 Easy Steps! > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
