<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
________________________________
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Fri=2C 16 Oct 2009 08:08:21 -0500
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] html for Fossil wiki language ?
>
> Yeah=2C e-mail me if you want to talk more about it=2C I've done a fair b=
it of pondering on the subject myself=2C would love to share and discuss.
>
> More to topic: I'd love to see something simpler than HTML used for Fossi=
l=2C it's a bridge that a lot of people have to leap and would make the int=
erface a lot easier for new people=2C which is a huuuuuge plus.
>
Following is just my personal opinion=2C
One thing I realized over the years is that "new people/customer/users" has=
many types when contributing knowledge. I only know two types in my work e=
nvironment.
1. people are willing to learn text markup languages.
=A0=A0 I am in type 1. and I don't like to learn extra wiki languages if ht=
ml can do the work already.=20
2. people only want to type in texts and use GUI menu for formatting.
=A0=A0 This type of person is in majority=2C they are important if a wiki s=
olution is targeting them for contribution.
=A0=A0 they usually ask can I have my contribution article export back in M=
S Word format ?
=A0=A0 or can I drag my word document into your wiki page ?
I=A0 am so glad to see sqlite author do it right again(for my requirements =
=3B)
I like to see more html syntax got supported.
tj
>
>
>
> For reference=2C Google Code already does this.
>
> On Thu=2C Oct 15=2C 2009 at 3:48 PM=2C Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> {i|{*|{a www.example.com|{img|http://example.com/icon.gif}Parenthese
>
>> overload}}}
>
>>
>
>> vs
>
>>
>
>> [http://example.com/icon.gif%20
>%20%20
>%20%20
>%20%20
>%20%20
>%20>] Parenthese overload
>
>>
>
>> Oh yeah=2C so much easier to read =3B)
>
>
>
> For me=2C at least. The point is that with HTML I know where what tag
>
> ends=2C while with curly brackets version I don't.
>
>
>
> Allright=2C I think we're off the topic now. Let me summarize: some
>
> people prefer HTML and some people like other markup languages. Fossil
>
> wikis have:
>
>
>
> * HTML markup=2C described here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/wik=
i_rules
>
> * Simple wiki formatting rules=2C like * bullets=2C 1. ordered lists=2C
>
> [links]=2C etc. ( ^ same link )
>
>
>
> There's also creole markup (http://www.wikicreole.org/) branch here:
>
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?t=3Dcreole
>
>
>
> I think this is enough for most people.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dmitry Chestnykh
>
> Coding Robots
>
>
>
> http://www.codingrobots.com
>
> [email protected]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> fossil-users mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
>
=20
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/=
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
