On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:

> IMO, duplicating the shell functionality is the wrong approach,  
> mainly because there will be behavioural differences between  
> fossil's and the shell's globbing. i agree it would be convenient  
> for us users, but it technically could not be guaranteed to behave  
> the same as the user's shell, and therefore could cause confusion or  
> even data loss (e.g. accidental removal or even purging by using an  
> incompatible glob pattern).

Which is exactly why "fossil rm *.foo" should delete *.foo from the  
file system as well as from the repository.  If you forget, and do "rm  
*.foo", then you can ask fossil to give you the files back, and then  
do "fossil rm *.foo" so that you don't need to type in all of the names.

Will

>
> -- 
> ----- stephan beal
> http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

------------------------------------------------------------------
        will -at- wjduquette.com      | Catch our weblog,
http://foothills.wjduquette.com/blog | The View from the Foothills


_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to