On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:26:06AM -0800, Michael wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:19:26AM -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > On Dec 17, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Michael wrote: > > > > > > Richard, were you able to reproduce the problem I described ? > > > > > > Do you have any idea(s) why you saw 'MISSING' and I saw 'DELETED' > > > using the same packages ? > > > > I have not tried to reproduce it. I think other issue are more > > pressing - such as dealing with files that have changed into > > directories and handling MISSING files on update. If this really is an > > issue, we'll get to it. But I'm willing to believe this was operator > > error on my part or something. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Acknowledged - thanks - will wait for new fossil to test in > my current environment. > > ~Michael > > > < < znip > > _______________________________________________________________________
$ fossil version This is fossil version [2d996b080e] 2009-12-17 22:55:26 UTC This version worked for original problem [details in earlier mails]. With this version, 'fossil commit' complained about fossil: not a ordinary file: path/to/a/symlink I 'rm path/to/a/symlink' and then the commit occcured as expected. Note that path/to/a/symlink was not in the repository hence I did not do a 'fossil rm'. Thank you. ~Michael _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
