On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 10:19:14AM -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> 
> On Feb 1, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> 
> > wrote:
> >>>> I wish it served a page at the root that listed all hosted
> >>>> repositories.  Would it be a security problem to do that?
> >>>
> >>> I thought it would be.  Perhaps not in every instance, but I can
> >>> envisions scenarios where a user would not want that listing to  
> >>> appear.
> >>
> >> The standard solution of web servers is to see if index.html exists  
> >> in the
> >> directory and if so, serve that page; if not a 404 results. Many  
> >> servers
> >> have the option to do a listing, but that is just that: an option.
> >>
> >
> > Hm, an index.html is a great suggestion! (sent mine before reading  
> > this one).
> 
> 
> If Fossil returns the index.html file, then before long you also want  
> to return various images and CSS files that index.html references.   
> And then people will want a way to return favicon.ico.  And  
> robots.txt.  And then you will need a way to customize the mimetypes  
> of the various files. Already here is a feature request to allow the  
> repositories to have extensions other than ".fossil".  How long before  
> people want the ability to handle multiple domains using the HTTP_HOST  
> property of the HTTP header?
> 
> I do *not* want to turn Fossil into a general-purpose web server and  
> replacement for Apache.  That is not its purpose.  We have to draw the  
> line somewhere, and I propose to draw the line here.
> 
> D. Richard Hipp
> [email protected]
> 
_______________________________________________


   thank you, I agree


-- 
Michael McDaniel
http://putitgetit.com

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to