On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:00 -0800, [email protected] wrote: > the initial import into Fossil rocked because it was only about 250 > megs.
How did you manage the import? I have worked very lightly on importing from svn, but haven't got a full solution yet. > it would actually force the programmers to use more disk space as near > as I can tell - and mine isn't the only repo they use. Are you operating under some unusual conditions that your developers' machines don't have GB to spare? My 500 GB hdd is about 1/4 full, so I wouldn't really think of a 1 GB checkout as problematically large. Fossil's behavior seems to be pretty standard for DVCS, no? > While space is a big concern, keeping users out of some projects is > even more important. If you can't break up your existing repo into several projects-specific repos, it's hard for me to think of a fossil solution for this. > git on Windows - well, enough said there, it was pretty painful when I > tested it 6 months ago. I've heard good things about this: http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/ -- i.e., that git on Windows is just fine with it. -- Joshua Paine LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy http://letterblock.com/ 301-576-1920 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
