Just a quick update. I had a spare hour or so, so, I extended it to
support tags. I'm still looking to see about branches.

Thanks,

-B

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Brian Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've not used svn in ages, but if the need/want arises I might take a
> stab at it. :)
> IMO, the easiest way to handle svn repos is to just require a certain
> layout for the repository. I'm aware of another tool or two that do
> that. And, if you're in possession of one of those "multiple project"
> svn repos that have a layout like: /proj1/{trunk,tags,branches}
> /proj2/{trunk,tags,branches}, I'd do an svndump (or is that svnadmin
> dump?) and run it through a filter to get multiple dumps - one per
> project.
>
> At the moment, the tool is pretty "dumb" it doesn't exactly use all
> the metadata git gives it. In particularly, I want to play with a git
> repo that uses the "notes" object type and see if I can convert those
> to some sort of simplistic wiki page. The other feature that's next on
> the list is handling branches and tags properly. There'll be a bit of
> information lost unless fossil tags can contain comments (something
> which, if possible, isn't documented that I can find).
> I need to spend some more time with the git fast-import man page to
> fully grok format that git fast-export gives me.
>
> I'd definitely be interested in hearing feedback from people about
> improvements I could make (and/or bug fixes).
> I've only tested this on very simple repositories (though, one of them
> did have multiple root commits).
>
> -B
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Joshua Paine <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 06:51 +0200, Ron Aaron wrote:
>>> Very cool!  So... do you want to do something similar for subversion?
>>
>> I'm working on it, but I'd be thrilled if someone beat me to it!
>>
>> (SVN is challenging b/c it has no concept of branches or tags, just
>> copies to arbitrary pseudo-file-tree locations.)
>>
>> --
>> Joshua Paine
>> LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy
>> http://letterblock.com/
>> 301-576-1920
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fossil-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to