On 3/17/2010 6:44 PM, Michael Barrow wrote: > There is no such thing as a non-active Wiki page per se. You could > remove links to said page if you want to keep it around and then edit > the page to say "Hey -- we're just keeping this for archival purposes. > Otherwise, 'shun' is the tool to use. I've done in on some of my > installations for pages that I really wanted to go away.
If this is the case then I would say the Fossil wiki has to be changed to be a usable wiki. No one is going to create a perfect wiki structure the first time around and no one wants old pages listed in their "Index" page. All wiki's have a delete function and if Fossil wants to be considered seriously as a replacement for other project wiki's, it has to support delete and rename. People are going to be attracted to fossil as an all in one package and if it can not provide the functionality needed in the wiki, then people will say why use Fossil for SCM and then have to interface in with another Wiki system? I now have to piece together a system, thus, why not just piece together a different SCM as well. Jeremy _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
