Hello! I'm continuing to explore Fossil and played a bit with merge's cherrypick options...
It is quite good, although quite different than the same thing in darcs, i.e. using fossil's 'merge --cherrypick' I was able to pick selected 'artifact' or 'patch', but one still needs to commit it afterwards. Of course, in darcs one can just pull the artifact/patch into the repo and have it since darcs can reorder patches. otoh, I read the following in docs: " Fossil is designed in such a way that it can be handed a set of artifacts in any order and it can figure out the relationship between those artifacts and reconstruct the complete development history of a software project." which invokes feelings similar to using darc, but, obviously, Fossil is different design. Still, considering that Fossil is the most innovative DVCS system after darcs, I'd appreciate if some (ex)-darcs user familiar-enough with Fossil can shed some more light on the topic of "Fossil's best practices in comparison with the darcs". I saw "Coming to Fossil from darcs", but it speaks only about rudimentary stuff... Anyone? Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: F96FF5F6 ----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
