Well, my understanding of rebase has changed since then, due to the same problem we faced. Git 'forgets' unpublished versions when doing rebase (but it need not - I may still be wrong here). I'm sure if fossil implements rebase, it will not forget old versions.
What I'm interested in is the 'feature' of rebase where it can re-apply changes to a new a new head. The result may be in a new branch. - Altu -----Original Message----- From: Eric <e...@deptj.eu> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Sent: Wed, Jun 23, 2010 12:27 pm Subject: Re: [fossil-users] fossil rebase > Hi,>> Is there a rebase feature in fossil that is similar to git rebase? If> not, is it planned?>> - AltuAnd what is different sincehttp://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg017 89.html?Eric_______________________________________________fossil-users mailing listfossil-us...@lists.fossil-scm.orghttp://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi -bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
