-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello. I'm using Fossil on a small project I started recently and it
seems like an interesting concept. There is one thing about which I'm
unclear, however.

The reference states that multiple working trees can be tied to a single
repository. How exactly is this done, and I'm wondering if it is what I
think it is?

I have a group of tangentially related projects that all use a core
library and have various interdependencies. Even though they serve
different niches (core library, web service and mobile app using aspects
of said core library, etc.) I would still benefit from tracking them
under a single issue tracker/wiki hierarchy. Sometimes an issue that
manifests in one app actually originates in the core library. I was
thinking of doing a multi-project Redmine installation for this but
never quite set it up, partially because of the trouble and partially
because I vastly prefer distributed development.

Is that what the multiple working tree support is intended to
accomplish, or am I very confused about what a working tree means in
this context? :)

I'm also wondering if this approach is how wiki pages, issues, etc. are
versioned such that it's possible to edit the wiki/HTML/CSS as plain text?

This looks like an interesting concept. Not sure if I like it yet but
I'm willing to give it a shot.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyAU0gACgkQIaMjFWMehWJtQgCeLhvPfUvWyc12wiNEOW9ZuvUS
6TwAn0bgQ2kSPC5BCpx3+m3iU5P1nM4q
=NOfi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to