On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:22:42PM +0200, Trou Macacq wrote: > About fossil server... on production (not ad hoc) this means using > inetd daemon. And I might say something stupid, but I'm almost sure it > not installed on my Ubuntu server 10.10 by default. And I trying to > keep everything as standard as possible. Is this itetd setup really > better than CGI. Where I can find a list of advantages and > disadvantages of this approach?
No, it doesn't mean inetd. You might want to use daemon for this purpose though. The primary different to using httpd+CGI is that this only requires a fork per request, not an exec. Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
