On Dec 15, 2010, at 22:10 , Joshua Paine wrote: > On 12/15/2010 04:00 PM, Zach Todd wrote: >> I have updated the merge conflict code as well as config setup to >> allow for configurable notation. > >> Doesn't this call for configurable notation? ;) >> Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski > > Maybe I missed it, but I sure thought Remigiusz was joking.
I'm not sure. I just found the idea of adding another layer of complexity slightly amusing. But if we don't agree on what's the better idea, then actually configurable notation may be the way to go. Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
