On Jan 3, 2011, at 20:19 , Stephan Beal wrote: > For a small project with 1-2 devs who work in different timezones, it might > be reasonable. And read-only access should never be a problem. The main > difference for people "watching" the repo would be that they never need to > "fossil pull" because dropbox copies over the changes.
At this moment they don't have to "fossil pull" manually. The only reason for turning autosync off is being off-network. Which also hoses your Dropbox synchronization. No gain here. The only possible reason I see for such a thing is having no place to host a fossil server. Which, I guess, does not happen often for any dev teams. Fossil has very small requirements. Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
