> And this is what private commits are for. Work pretty well if you > have something, that you don't want to show. It's only a shame > they're not emphasized well in the docs (or at least were not the > last time I checked).
Private commits are useless if you work in more than one computer and need to commit from all of them. There should be some kind of private branch that could be selectively cloned depending on the user or some other attribute. RR 2011/2/10 Remigiusz Modrzejewski <l...@maxnet.org.pl>: > > On Feb 8, 2011, at 19:10 , Stephan Beal wrote: > >> Woul it be less administrative hassle, and help reduce "pollution" of the >> main repo (in the form of 26 branches - that's the current count) > > 26 *open* branches you meant? At least this is what the number suggests... > Well, I think I have a solution then - get them closed ;) > >> (Personally, i don't like the idea of my "intermediary crud" adding to the >> clone size of the main repo.) > > And this is what private commits are for. Work pretty well if you have > something, that you don't want to show. It's only a shame they're not > emphasized well in the docs (or at least were not the last time I checked). > > > Kind regards, > Remigiusz Modrzejewski > > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
