On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Kristoffer Lawson <se...@scred.com> wrote:
> > On 3 Mar 2011, at 13:41, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Trou Macacq <mac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Design matters. > > > > > > Design != eye-candy > > Actually there is research to the opposite :-) > > When tested people quite literally find better looking services to be > easier. The exact same functionality, or even worse functionality, when it > looks good, is rated as being easier. > Fair enough. So I spruced up the website with some CSS. What else do you recommend. > > I agree with the posters here that the main Fossil website could do with a > bit of a touch up. If we were using Fossil I could possibly justify spending > a few hours doing a bit of design on it myself. As it stands I wouldn't want > to promise anything, although I'd be tempted to play around with it. > > For the record I don't think we need some full-blown Web 2.0 Ajax monster, > with half of the functionality not working or taking forever to load. The > Fossil website is simple, and is great for that reason. So I'd be looking > more at a tummy tuck than anything too extensive. > > -- > Kristoffer Lawson, Co-Founder, Scred // http://www.scred.com/ > http://travellingsalesman.mobi - 10000km & The world's most arctic > startups > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
