> Basically, Unix won. I think Windows is the last system maintaining
> backwards compatibility to systems that predate the rise of Unix.
> Pretty much everything else either was designed with the Unix model in
> mind, or converted to it somewhere along the way.

How is abandoning backwards compatibility in any way linked to winning?  
Frankly, I’m surprised at how often MS seems to get beat up on this list; many 
of us are Windows users and developers.  Personally it gets under my skin; 
maybe it shouldn't.  Kudos to Windows for supporting customers with backwards 
compatibility and interoperability - something that other operating systems 
apparently can't be burdened with.

RW

Ron Wilson, Engineering Project Lead
(o) 434.455.6453, (m) 434.851.1612, www.harris.com

HARRIS CORPORATION   |   RF Communications Division     assuredcommunications™

_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to